Showing posts with label the Bible. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the Bible. Show all posts

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Teaching the Bible in Public Schools, a Cirriculum Discussion Guide

There's been a lot of talk recently about certain states wanting to introduce the Bible into school cirriculums.  I grew up in Oklahoma, and the state superintendent of schools has decreed that Bibles (originally the New King James Bible, endorsed by none other than the current President-Election and also including the Constitution and Declaration of Independence) be placed in classrooms and instruction be offered about said Bibles.  This has caused a lot of angst amongst those in our increasingly post-Christendom world because of the demand for separation of church and state; it's also brought angst amongst even many Christians because what happens if little Timmy is told by his atheist teacher that everything in the Bible is just a pious fairy tale?  

I've never taught in schools and have no idea how to organize a cirriculum program, but as one who has two graduate degrees in religion as well as almost 30 years of church ministry, I thought I'd take a shot in putting together a discussion guide for schools about various topics on a middle-to-high school level.  It's not all-inclusive, of course, but there's a few Biblical items that demand discussion and I'm certain wouldn't cause any problem for my more conservative friends.  

Wealth and Prosperity.  

-Jesus of Nazareth tells a rich man to sell all he has and give to the poor (cf. Mark 10:21, Luke 18:22, Matthew 19:21).  Questions for class discussion: If we think of ourselves as a Christian nation, how best do we enact this as government policy?  What is the proper upper wage to begin mandatory enforcement of this Biblical rule? 

Foreigners

-The laws of the Old Testament continually speak of the need to love the sojourners (foreigners).  They must not be oppressed (Exodus 22:21), they must be loved (Deuteronomy 10:19), and as workers they must be fairly treated (Deuteronomy 24:14).  Questions for class discussion: How do we properly respond to political leaders who call all sojourners amongst us 'vermin', demand their deportation, and spread rumors about how they eat common house pets?  

Divorce

-Marriage and divorce are common social problems today, and were known by Jesus and his disciples.  Jesus was very strict about divoce, going so far as to say that to divorce a spouse and remarry is adultery (cf. Mark 10:11-12).  Questions for class discussion: What should we do with political leaders who have broken these commands?  Would it be possible to remove them from public office, especially if they have broken these commands multiple times?  

Sexual Assault (for high school honors classes only!)

-Deuteronomy 22:25-29 speaks to two instances of sexual assault; one outcome has the rapist put to death, while the other has the rapist responsible for the financial and social well-being of his victim the rest of his life.  Questions for class discussion: Given that many of our national leaders have been proven in court or in ethics investigations to be pedophiles, guilty of sexual assault, or simply horrible past behavior, how best should we follow clear Biblical teaching about them?  Should we kill them publicly as an example of our righteousness?  Or should it be more privately done to reduce their families' guilt?  Give clear reasoning for your answer.  

------

I have no doubt that the God-honoring, Bible thumping conservatives in our country will be all in favor of my cirriculum, so once it begins being implemented I'll work on the other topics.  But for now this should keep everyone busy...


Thursday, October 29, 2020

From Young Conservative to Middle-Aged Disciple

I will admit it: I've changed.  Part of me wants to fall back on the expression, "I didn't leave my party, they left me."  And while that may be partially true (the GOP of today is a dried-out shell of what it was 30 years ago), I've also distanced myself from much of the ideology and politics of my youth.  Occasionally people I knew long ago will be surprised that I don't support Trumpism, that I believe the current movement of mainstream conservatism to be wholly unChristian and pagan.  After they accuse me of supporting abortionists and radical leftists (I don't) because in their dualistic mindset you're either a True Believer or in league with devil democrats, a few may still have enough of a curious mind as to ask why I've changed.  So, having thought about this over a long period of time, let me explain.  

I grew up Republican.  My parents didn't talk about politics much directly, but I knew that they were big supporters of Ronald Reagan and occasional donors to the GOP.  I inherited from them and the conservative community in which I grew up a sense that conservatism was morally pure.  On the one hand I was told that Democrats wanted to support gay rights, abortion on demand, women in the military, and tax increases for hard-working Americans.  Republicans, however, were morally superior.  They supported 'traditional family values', an honest work ethic, and a sense that America was God's great blessing to the world, and even the endless wars we seemed to export were part of a greater moral crusade.  And so if Democrats were not quite the America-hating enemy they would someday become, they were yet Wrong.  I absorbed this mindset as being the proper patriotic Christian worldview with little teenaged rebellion.  

At age 17 I entered into a Christian university of my religious heritage that had a decidedly conservative ethos.  Its leaders in the past had been anti-communist activisits and its leaders in the present were God-fearing American patriots.  The economics courses in which I minored had a decidedly free-market bent (Free To Choose by Milton Friedman was the sacred text).  The American Studies program of which I was an invited member invited speakers like Ed Meese, Alan Keyes, and William F Buckley.  And so while one of my main polysci professors (who has long left there) was a closet liberal and covertly challenged some of the America-first proclaimations that seemed so comonplace on the rest of the campus, it was not suprising that I was strengthened in my resolve to be a good Republican and conservative.  That, after all, was what being a Christian was all about, right?  

After a few years of trying to figure out what to do with my life, I started graduate school in Christian ministry.  While it was of the same university umbrella as my undergraduate work, this school, instead of being in a small rural town, was located in very urban Memphis.  While there I was exposed to a much more critical understanding of my faith, moving me beyond childhood Sunday school religion to a more disciplined and cohesive kind of discipleship that demanded that I read all of Scripture, not just those parts that affirmed my faith.  While I was still very much a conservative Christian at this point, simply being exposed to other ways of thinking became a very important part of my Christian journey.  

And this journey continued on as I began my first ministry positions, first working in campus ministry in the midwest and then as a pulpit preacher for a small rural church on the west coast.  That both of these places were outside of the Bible belt (or at least on the edge of it) might have been important: the only churches that were willing to hire an untested and unmarried minister were ones that had few other options.  Most of my classmates who had more charisma and more family and more connections were able to settle into a classic southern religion heritage, but I was not.  And quickly it became apparent that no longer was I 'comfortable' in my setting; while I still preached with churches in conservative parts of America (and yes, rural Oregon may be the single most politically conservative place I've ever lived), it wasn't so much of a religious conservatism of doing right and pious living that surrounded me.  Rather, it was a kind of ideology that had shed much of its religious heritage and was more firmly rooted in an individualistic ethos of "It's all about me.  Government is evil.  I do what I want to do, and nobody can tell me otherwise."  As I get older in hindsight I can see that in fact this is what mainstream American conservatism was becoming, but at the time it seemed simply a product of the place in which I lived.

This turned out to be a great challenge of faith to me, because as I began my fledgling ministry career, I was still a solid conservative.  Being unmarried and having far too much time on my hands, I began listening a lot more to the growing conservative media that began springing up at that time in response to the perception that mainstream news outlets were too liberal.  Rush Limbaugh became a daily listen.  Fox News became a fascination for me, and not just because of the cute blondes in the short skirts that seemed to be on every program.  And reading other crusading conservatives and connecting with other like-minded individuals on this new thing known as the 'World Wide Web' helped reaffirm much of what I believed.  Bill and Hillary Clinton were evil.  Liberals hated America.  Only conservatism could save America from the socialists who would destroy it.

Yet being in an area in which my social life was greatly restricted while being too socially awkward to do much about it, I had a lot more time to continue digging into the Scriptures and understand more of what it was that I preaching.  It's not that I tore off my old understandings, but I did start challenging them in a way that I had not before.  Reading the prophets of the Old Testament, for example, started to undermine my belief in prosperity as a proof of godliness.  In fact, it started to become clear to me that God wanted much more from me than to simply be a Good Religious Person...he wanted me to walk in his own Goodness.  Passages like Hosea 6, Amos 5, and Zechariah 7 helped me to see that my faith was not this individualistic American piety that I had long believed it to be...rather, it was also to be about seeking out justice for the fallen, showing mercy to those in trouble, and defending the cause of those who were oppressed.  I began to wrestle with the many denunciations of hoarding wealth while others suffered and how many of my conservative Christian brethren sought to separate out religion from everyday life.  We couldn't let our religion get in the way with the American pursuit of prosperity, could we?  Paired with a re-reading of the social laws of the Torah in which the need to do right by one's neighbor was central to being righteous before God, and I began to see that while my earlier understandings were not fully wrong, neither were they complete.  Were we to simply explain away the radical social re-ordering of the Jubilee year, in which society was to economically reset in order to bring about equality and fairness?  Were we to ignore the warnings about the economic injustice so prevalent in that era which were to bring about God's wrath, and rather continue to believe in a 'health and wealth' gospel in practice, if not in name?  

Of course, it was likely the writings of the New Testament that caused me to think most differently.  Having read the Bible through many times, it was (and still is) impossible to fully seek to do as Alexander Campbell advised in trying to read the Bible as if we've never read it before.  Even today sometimes in my reading I find myself simply nodding and affirming myself.  Yet it was in reading about the mission of Jesus in Luke 4:18-19 that I started to see that if the church is really the body of Christ, shouldn't it be doing what Jesus did?  It became much more difficult to explain away the commands of Jesus to sell everything and give to the poor and then come and follow him (Mark 10:21).  It became obvious that we were to honor Zacchaeus (Luke 19) not just as a 'wee little man' but as an example of somebody who gave up a life of radical self-interest in order to radically follow Jesus. And in reading the reality of the early church in Jerusalem as it concerned the social order conforming to the needs of many, it became more challenging to think about how they shared all they had and 'gave to anyone as he had need' (Acts 2:44).  For most of my life I was taught that we were to be New Testament Christians, who were called to do Bible things in Bible ways.  And for the first time in my life, it became apparent that this was true not just in the few hours we met together as a church, but daily as we sought to be disciples in all that we did.  

And so my inner struggle grew, not just with what I was (and was not) seeing in the American church both local and in the culture, but also within myself.  How was I to reconcile the conservatism of my youth with the discipleship I yearned for as a true disciple of Jesus?  I began to listen much more critically to the right-wing media that I had allowed to be my political guidestar...and I began to realize how far away it was from Christianity that I was reading about in my Bible.  Was I to despise liberals, be suspicious of immigrants and people of other races, and be only concerned about my financial well-being and individual freedom?  Or was my Christianity that sought out the needs of others more important?  

I suppose there have been many stops along the way in this journey.  

-Sometimes it symbolic, like the time after 9/11 when on a church down the street from where I lived a huge American flag was planted on top of the cross that graced the top of their building.  Did the flag really trump the cross?  Sure seemed that way for many within the church!  

-Other times it was witnessing the loud and angry nationalist fervor of many of my fellow Christians: were they citizens of the kingdom of God first, or were they American citizens first?  This was long before I really started to dig into the depths of Jesus' teaching about the Kingdom and what that was all about, but even through those days I knew something was not quite right.  

-It increasingly struck me as odd that the 'culture wars' that many Christians were fighting had little to do with authentic Bibilcal Christianty and was more about maintaining social order.  And the generals they continued to follow in such wars themselves time and again turned out to be more morally corrupt than those they preached against!  

-And through it all, I continued to see how many of my fellow Christians continued to nod politely at the preaching of the gospel of grace and love and righteousness, yet only really get excited about kicking ass in the Middle East, whatever football team they rooted for, ensuring that they could buy the most powerful weapons they can get their hands on, and conservative promises to 'take back our country' from the liberals (or libtards, or democraps, or any other derisive names they had for anybody who aren't as patriotic as the flag-waving Americans think themselves to be).  

Even after all this, it's not that I think myself a liberal as I pass a half-century of life.  Far from it...I'm probably still a bit right-of-center on the political spectrum.  I don't think much of some social programs that seem more about good intentions than verifiable results.  I wish there were no more abortions and no more broken families.  I think we are better off with judges who read the law for what it says, not what they want it to mean.  I struggle with why tax dollars ought to prop up the degrading lifestyle of the willfully obese or the careless or the addicted or the many others who refuse to change their ways.  And while I'm more likely than I used to to think that in a pluralistic country we ought to tolerate the lifestyles of those which our faith considers sin, this does not mean that I believe we should be so tolerant as to be restricted to silence when it comes to challenging those who live and promote self-destructive lives, nor seek to enable sin in the name of 'diversity'.  The gospel which we proclaim should not be altered to fit the moral relativity of today.  

It's not easy to find the right balance, especially in this age in which we are so polarized between Right and Left.  I'm not alone in feeling that I have no real ideological home these days.  The GOP has lost all moral and intellectual credibilty, the Democrats have ideas but few of them fresh, and any other position seems likely to make us into a party of one.  I'm a registered Libertarian, but I don't take it seriously because they don't seem to, either (c'mon, win something, anything, anywhere!); nor do what I think libertarianism means (freedom from oppression so that we can serve others) is the same as what most others think libertarianism means (freedom for me so nobody ever tells me what to do).  

Yet do I really need that ideological home?  As a citizen of the Kingdom of God, I feel as if I truly do have a home already.  I'm a disciple of Jesus Christ, not perfect in myself or my understanding of the world around me, but transformed by the renewing power of the Holy Spirit.  I am liberated from sin not to serve myself, but to be a blessing to people around me.  It struck me awhile back that when Paul talked about the fruit of the Spirit in Galatians 5, his line concerning those fruits 'Against such things there is no law' is not a throwaway line but a recognition that if we truly live as people producing spiritual fruit, there's nothing anybody can do against us, there's no law or government edict that can truly deprive us of the freedom that is most important.  Yes, sometimes because we proclaim that Jesus Christ is King we will face opposition, even persecution.  But the things that far too often define what American Christianity is about today are far removed from the core gospel.  Such things (e.g. gun rights, obsessing about personal freedom, rallying against government involvement in health care or social services, American Exceptionalism, fervorously supporting the military and the police, border controls, etc.) are far more American than they are Christian.  Without a doubt, we are living in an age in which the substance of American Christianity has been diluted to the point that, as Jesus would have said, its salt has lost its saltiness and deserve to be thrown out.  

I don't know the way back for our country, beyond the Biblical pattern of repentance, crying out to God, obedience, and seeking reconciliation with our neighbors.  Unfortunately, as the history of Israel makes clear, such things only seem to happen when God sends a plague upon his people; they have to hit bottom to wake up and see what is righteousness again.  Even then, people often refuse to change...and in the meantime we are so comfortable in our American Christianity that I don't see any hint that there will be revival anytime soon.  Maybe COVID should have been that wake-up call...much like economic recessions, 9/11, or other national crises should have been seen as the bullhorn of the Lord.  But the people most refusing change, it appears, are those many Christians who have accepted Donald J Trump (or, less commonly, amoralistic liberalism) as their Lord and Savior.  Apostasy often appears to be the final portion of any once-great nation's spiral into sin, and as a whole we are going down that road with eyes wide opened, parading ourselves into oblivion.  

As for me and my household, though, I'd like to proclaim as those Hebrews entering Canaan all those years ago, 'we will serve the Lord.'  It's not that we will get it all right.  And over the next years of my life I will continue to change and grow.  Some of the stuff I mention here might be childish ramblings to my older self.  But I do think I'm closer to the truth now than I was as a young conservative.  I'm a middle-aged disciple, and I can live with that.  

Monday, March 25, 2019

Of Books and Bibles

Today I finished a book about a theological foundation for the church.  It's one of those books that once upon a time I would have absolutely loved for its eye-opening view of the church.  About 20-25 years ago, as I began ministry, there were a lot of these new viewpoints of Churches of Christ that ended up in print.  I have many of them on my shelf...a few are excellent, most are ordinary, and a few are terrible.  I also own some of the counter-reactions to this written by those who were terrified at the thought of change.  A few were well-reasoned and helpful but most were simply fearful rants about 'change agents'. 

As I get older and have now spent almost 24 years in full time ministry, though, these kind of books just don't appeal to me anymore.  Maybe it's that absorbed their content so fully that they don't have anything to say to me. But I think that the more likely answer is that I now am more interested in reading the Bible again.  Perhaps these books pushed me back to being more Biblical, and if so thank you, but I am more and more fascinated with what a two-millennia-old collection of Hebrew and Greek texts has to say about the church and about God and about my own faith and about the reality of the world around me than I am about what non-inspired people have to say on just about anything. 

Not sure exactly how I came this way, but I love the Bible so much more than I used to.  I used to think of it as something I had to read as a good Christian, and something I had to mine as to be a competent preacher.  Do I read the Bible more than I used to?  Not really...right now I am doing a daily Bible reading program on my app, and I'm not preaching any more exegetically than I used to (I've always depended upon thru-the-Bible to set up most of my preaching).  But the Bible seems now more alive to me than it ever did before. 

I'm sure if I was to forensically examine this, I could give great thanks to many good Bible teachers I've had in the past, or books that have pointed me in the right direction.  But I wonder if the real gamechanger was when I started to take the Psalms and the Prophets more seriously.  That happened around the same time, not long after we moved here 13 years ago.  They are Scripture, but they are a very different kind of Scripture...not law, not story, but rather poetry and prophetic correction.  I always thought of Scripture in terms of those first two, but even though other poetry interests me not at all, and prophetic correction even now can seem a bit overbearing, I think pulling these into my frame of mind has given me the closest hope of grasping the totality of God's story as I have been able to get.  It's still not complete, of course, but no longer do I look at Scripture and just sigh and think that it's too big, too inaccessible. 


Friday, February 1, 2019

The Bible in School

So there's a story that's gone under the radar a bit this week, that Trump is trying to shore up his base by encouraging schools to study the Bible, though it's never something he himself did.  Years ago I might have thought this was a good thing...but the older I get the more I could see that this might be a disaster for what remains of the Christian faith in this country.  It's not just that the closer Christians get to worldly power that they become less effective. 

But my first reaction this week in hearing this is "Who's going to be teaching?  And how will they approach the Bible?  Through the eyes of faith?  Or simply as just another book to be studied?"  Those who are older can appreciate the Bible as a literary masterpiece, I believe...but what about children?  Do those of us who are trying to instill a sense of faith through Biblical teaching really want to open the doors of others misusing it for a right-wing political agenda?  Think about it...

-In Joshua 10 there's the story of the sun standing still while Joshua holds up his hands and Israel fights a battle.  How's that going to be handled by somebody who does not look at Scripture through the eyes of faith? 
-When 1 Samuel 18:3 speaks about the covenant relationship David and Jonathan had because of their love, how's that going to be presented in this world in which same-sex relationships are affirmed?  Will it really be taught in its context or will it be used by teachers with certain agendas that conservative Christians would strongly object to? 
-Will the story of the death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus be taught as fact, or as a myth explaining Christian origins?  The same could be asked about creation. 
-When it comes to reading Revelation, how will that be interpreted?  What if it is taught by a literalist who sees it as a timeline for the end times through a dispensational premillennial lens? 
-And heck, what will economic conservatives do when it comes to reading about the church in Acts selling all they have and pooling resources together?  Or reading prophetic denunciations of the wealthy buying second homes while the poor don't have anything?  Can you really see little Johnny come home and telling his MAGA parents that the Bible teaches communism? 

In a perfect world I want my children to learn Scripture as much as possible.  But I know about Scripture enough to know how badly it can be handled, sometimes even within the church.  So then do I really want my children to be confused at this point in their lives?  Someday they will have to make some hard decisions on how to read Scripture...but I want them guided by people of faith, not by public school teachers whose faith I know nothing about. 

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Evangelism and Bible Study

This one will be unpopular.  Hold on.

The opening line in any Church of Christ evangelistic move is always the same:  "Would you like to have a Bible study?"  Throughout my life I have acquired dozens, if not hundreds, of pamphlets that all center on a study of the Scriptures in order to bring somebody to the point of baptism.  Though they all have their quirks, all jump from Scripture to Scripture along this journey.  This was how I was trained to do 'personal work', to bring people to Christ.

As I have gotten older, however, I am finding that this is not the best method for today.  Quite simply, in my opinion beginning with Bible sutdy focuses far more on the head, about finding out about Christ and about the church than it does on the heart, in which somebody follows Jesus.

It's not that I think Bible study is bad...far from it.  But I do wonder whether or not we should rather focus upon Bible study more after somebody is baptized rather than when somebody is simply learning God's will for the first time.  Because my experience is that learning to be a genuine follower of Jesus Christ is not so much about knowing all the right things to know, but rather a heart that loves Jesus and sees his impact in the lives of other believers.  Isn't this what Hebrews 1:1-2 is saying about how God speaks to people today, or how John 1:1-5 speaks of Jesus as being the 'word' of God?  Most of the people I have had the honor to baptize in my life chose to be baptized not because of a perfect kind of head knowledge, but rather because they had seen in me (and in others) the power of a changed, sanctified life.  Later on they would study Scripture and want to know more detail of what that life looks like...but I wonder whether or not we have baptized a lot of heads and not so much their hearts.

Here's an example: many of the pamphlets I have looked at will have a long section about the need for the church.  And that's absolutely right...the church is the body of Christ, and a new (or any) Christian cannot hope to thrive or grow without the church.  But most pamphlets will speak about the church: the 'qualifications' of elders, what makes God happy in worship (prayer, the Lord's Supper, giving, Bible study, and especially non-instrumental music), and perhaps, in some of the more modern ones, the need for love.  Yet again, while these things might be right in their teaching, often they do little to really draw somebody into the church.  If a preacher or a church member has a private Bible study with somebody and that person is then baptized, most often to this point there has been little or no real contact with the church.  No chance to see it as a place of love, fellowship, and good works.  It's no wonder, then, that many new Christians quickly fall away from the church, because they never had a chance to know it!

Another problem with these kinds of studies is that many people today are not so willing to follow along the proof-text path.  One might bring up a subject like the inspiration of Scripture...and usually most studies will jump straight towards 2 Timothy 3:16-17 or 2 Peter 1:20-21.  Fair enough, this is how I was taught and I believe these truths.  But then there are questions...reading the context, these Scriptures are speaking of the Old Testament, not the New, what then?  Or should we immediately accept the statements from Scripture itself about its inspiration?  Don't all religious texts (the Quran, the Book of Mormon, etc.) do this to some extent?  Quickly this leads us down a path of subjects that many even faithful Christians do not know about.  Simply following along the old paths that many were trained with are no longer enough.

I am more convinced than ever that evangelism, in this day and age, is not easy, but it is possible if we will allow time for people to see the life of Jesus within us.  But we're not usually ready for that...we'd rather have them buy our understanding of things, and shake the dust off of our feet when they are not so ready to accept it.

We are Bible-believing Christians, but first and foremost we ought to be Jesus-following disciples.  If we really live like this, people will be able to see him in us and that will make all the difference.

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

The Handmaid's Tale and Biblical Illiteracy

I have been watching The Handmaid's Tale, adapted from the book of the same name, on Hulu the past few weeks.  Not the greatest show I've ever seen, but it's still a solid 8.  Two things keep running through my head as I watch it.

First, how do the villains in movies in which Bad Guys Take Over The World always find such a ready and willing supply of henchmen?  The premise of this movie is that a plot is devised in which the government is overthrown by militias sympathetic to this cause.  This, of course, makes one wonder where the police and military and national security agents were in all this.  In addition, in this age of constant Big-Brotherism, how extensive could the Gilead government be considering there are it seems a dozen dudes in black vests and stocking hats sitting on each corner in Boston?  And are these henchmen all being paid good wages?  Did none of them have wives or girlfriends who found out and reported these plots?  How on earth did this million-man militia arise without somebody at the Washington Post or the FBI getting word of it?

But second, and more importantly, what has really struck me about this show is how prevalent Biblically illiteracy would have to be for people to allow it to happen.  One of the key points of the show is that when the handmaidens are essentially raped each month in the hopes of producing a healthy heir, a passage of the Bible (Genesis 30, I think) is read as a guide for how this can happen.  Now, bad hermeneutics have enabled people to justify many terrible doctrines and practices over the years...but usually in every age there have people who have stood up and said, um, I think you are completely misunderstanding the Bible.

The more I think of it, though, even people who claim to be most religious often have no idea what their holy books actually teach, and ignorance allows those who misuse those books to get away with such things.  Those who should know better stay silent because, in the end, they don't really know, and when the evil people of Gilead point to Genesis 30, the people who know that this can't be right cannot say why it is not right.  Of course,  goes in many other directions as well...today many use the Bible to support conservative principles such as low taxation, income inequality, or 2nd amendment rights; of the latter issue, the one that cracked me up the most was the one in which Jesus' disciples say to him, "'Look, Lord, here are two swords.  And he said to them, 'It is enough.'"  As if Jesus was saying that self-defense weapons were justified before he went to the cross.  Liberals, too, misuse the Bible, thinking that Jesus only preached unlimited love and freedom without responsibility, salvation by just 'being good people' and the like...but again, they are just as wrong as conservatives.

This, my friends, is another reason why Biblical literacy matters.  It's not just about ensuring that we avoid sins, but that we don't get ourselves believing that the Bible endorses rape, extreme patriarchy, or any other kind of foolishness.  If we don't know what is right, then we can't very well speak up for what is right, can we?


Monday, October 3, 2016

Self-righteousness and me

In my daily reading today I read this: "Do not take to heart all the things that people say, lest you hear your servant cursing you.  Your heart knows that many times you have yourself cursed others."  (Ecclesiastes 7:21-22 ESV)

I know I have read this many times, and even have taught it a few times over the year, but wow...this really hit me hard.  Just as Jesus told his followers in the golden rule to treat others as they would want to be treated (Matthew 7:12), so here we are reminded about the power of cutting others some slack.  Do people treat us and say bad things once in a while?  Sure...but don't take it to heart.  You yourself say terrible things and treat others bad also!

There are so many applications here:
-When I am driving and somebody cuts me off, I want to flip them the bird and pound on the steering wheel.  But when I (mistakenly) do this, do I expect them to give me the benefit of the doubt?
-When I hear a bad sermon that seems to play fast and loose with God's word, I may condemn and hate the preacher.  But when I (mistakenly) do this, do I say that people shouldn't judge me too harshly?
-When after a long day my wife is not in a good mood I get frustrated that she is so cranky.  But when I (not-so-mistakenly) do this, am I hoping that others will cut me some slack?

So often these days I hear somebody talking about how badly they have been treated by others...but then they think nothing about treating others badly.  Why are we so hypocritical?  Why do we think we are exempt from the rules of social behavior?

The Teacher knew about this many years ago.  May I finally learn it from him.

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Grace is messy

A dear sister in the church contacted me recently to let me know she did not like my sermon on Tamar from Genesis 38.  It really is a rough story, 'R-rated' almost.  I can understand her difficulty with it, and before I preached it I thought long and hard whether or not to do so.  I've had some self-doubt after her comments, and it may well be that it wasn't well put together, or made the right applications, or was just poorly presented.  That could well be the case...sometimes I realize how unworthy I am to preach.

But this was not her point...she's always been positive and encouraging to me; her problem was with the story itself.  Maybe a general Sunday morning crowd is not the place for a story like that.  Maybe it belongs in a small group of older, mature adults.  Maybe.

Or maybe not.  As I've thought about this today I've thought about all the stories from the Bible that we would have to not preach about if we were nervous about the 'mature' content, and the list continues to grow.  Much of Abraham's story, out.  How do you preach about a guy who is so nervous about his own security he sends his wife to another man twice?  Later on he then tries to kill his son!  Most of the Judges (and Samuel and Kings...) is out...too much bloodshed.  David and Bathsheba is certainly out, as it involves the triad of lust, immorality, and murder.  The story about the other Tamar and Amnon and Absalom likewise is a story of rape and murder.  Hosea buys his wife back after she spends time as a prostitute.

And then what do we do with Jesus?  He's accused of being a drunk and a glutton.  He hangs out with whores, tax collectors (the mafia of the day), and various sinners.  He argues with people and causes a riot in the temple and is followed by scandal wherever he goes.  He dies a bloody, gruesome death.

I'm sure that some would be content with a bunch of homilies about being a good person.  James is a nice book, we might think...not a lot of stuff in there could make us nervous.  And Proverbs, that's nice too...until you see foolishness described as an alluring, wayward woman.

But when we take it as a whole there are a lot more stories in the Bible that are objectionable than we would care to admit.  Maybe we're just too squeamish today, but I think it has more to do with the fact that we think that grace is clean and sterile.  God comes in, lysols our tiny little mistake, and we move happily on.

The more I preach, though, I see how foolish that vision is.  Grace is messy.  God doesn't just have to make a minor course correction to our lives, he spends time cleaning up after us like we are an infant with a bad case of diarrhea.  It's nasty, and we don't want to talk about it, but it's real, and that messiness is reflected in all these stories.  As much as we want to explain these stories away, we can't, because then we have to ignore our own stories of sin.  There's nothing in the lives of people I have served with that isn't reflected by the Bible.

More importantly, though, there's no mess in our lives that can't be saved by grace.  Most of these stories ultimately are about redemption of one sort or another.  As messed up as people are, God comes in and makes things right, even when it seems impossible to us.  We may not like to admit it, but we need to read these messy stories to remind us of God's great blessing.